ABOUT US

Behind all the cacophony of being light years behind economic progress from China,in social justice from USA,we preen behind a veneer of alleged cultural superiority.From the wonderful monologue of Shahrukh Khan in Swades to the piece below this is given a different perspective.I happened to read this somewhere-it stands reconstructed by memory plus some additions/deletions/modifications by the undersigned.Read with an open mind for once-think about it-and hopefully do something about it.
With due acknowledgments to whomsoever its due,here is the thought.

 

THE TRANSACTIONAL SOCIETY No race can be congenitally corrupt. But can a race be corrupted by its culture? To know why we Indians are corrupt ,look at our patterns and practices . First: Religion is transactional in India. Indians give God cash and most of them anticipate an out-of-turn reward. Such a plea acknowledges that favours are needed for the undeserving. In the world outside the temple walls, such a transaction is named- “bribe”. A wealthy Indian gives not cash to temples, but gold crowns and such baubles. His gifts can not feed the poor. His pay-off is for God. He thinks it will be wasted if it goes to a needy man. In June 2009, The Hindu published a report of a politician gifting a crown of gold and diamonds worth Rs 45 crore to Tirupati. When Europeans came to India they built schools. When Indians go to Europe & USA, they build temples. We believe that if God accepts money/gifts for his favours/blessings, then nothing is wrong in doing the same thing for routine daily objectives. This is why Indians are so easily corruptible. Indian culture accommodates such transactions morally. There is no real stigma.   Second - Indian moral culpability towards corruption is visible in its history. Indian history tells of the capture of cities and kingdoms after guards were paid off to open the gates, and commanders paid off to surrender. This is unique to India. Our corrupt nature has meant limited warfare on the subcontinent. It is striking how little Indians have actually fought compared to ancient Greece and modern Europe. The Turks’ battles with Nadir Shah were vicious and fought to the finish. In India fighting wasn't needed, bribing was enough . Any invader willing to spend cash could brush aside India’s kings,no matter how many tens of thousands soldiers were in their infantry. Little resistance was given by the Indians at the “Battle” of Plassey. Clive paid off Mir Jaffar and all of Bengal folded to an army of 3,000. There was always a financial exchange to taking Indian forts. Golconda was captured in 1687 after the secret back door was left open. Mughals vanquished Marathas and Rajputs with nothing but bribes. The Raja of Srinagar gave up Dara Shikoh’s son Sulaiman to  Aurangzeb after receiving a bribe. There are many cases where Indians participated on a large scale in treason due to bribery. Question is: Why Indians have a transactional culture while other 'civilized' nations don't? Third - Indians do not believe in the theory that they all can rise if each of them behaves morally, because that is not the message of their faith. Our caste system separates us. We don't believe that all men are equal. This resulted in our division and migration to other religions . Many Hindus started their own faith like Sikh, Jain, Buddha and many converted to Christianity and Islam. The result is that Indians don't trust one another . There are no Indians in India ,there are Hindus ,Christians, Muslims etc. Indians forget that 1500 years ago they all belonged to one faith. This division evolved an unhealthy culture. The inequality has resulted in a corrupt society. In India every one is thus against everyone else, except God and even he must be bribed.